| An Interview with Cyndi Laurin: About New Leaders OR About the New Normal and Finding the Bright Lights that Drive Innovation into Your Business.
An Interview with Cyndi Laurin: About New Leaders OR About the New “Normal” and Finding the Bright Lights that Drive Innovation into Your Business.
Michael F. Shaughnessy - July 31, 2009
Senior Columnist EducationNews.org
Eastern New Mexico University
Portales, New Mexico
1) Cyndi, you have recently co-authored a book about leadership. Why did you choose this topic?
It is a book that includes leadership, but it’s really about how to tap into bright ideas from employees to take your organization to the next level. My co-author, Craig Morningstar, and I chose this topic because we realized that although we came from different backgrounds (I come from the academic realm, and Craig comes from the corporate world), we had similar experiences in being highly-creative individuals that didn’t really fit into our organizations’ cultural norms.
Along our own journeys, we have crossed paths with hundreds of other people like us, who see their world through a lens of potential, opportunity, and possibility but struggle to get their ideas implemented – or even heard, sometimes. In our own conversations, we would refer to these types of people as “highly-creative, entrapreneurial thinkers who don’t really fit in”. But as you can imagine, it was a long-winded description in need of refinement. One day, I said to Craig, “Aren’t they sort of like Rudolph, the Red-Nosed Reindeer? They look just like everybody else with just a little difference…they can’t turn off their bright ideas (or glowing nose, as in the case with the beloved reindeer).
2) What exactly is “The Rudolph Factor”?
Rudolphs are true agents of innovation – people who shine the light exactly where a company needs to go. We have found that 10 percent of every organization is made up of Rudolphs – although many are not visible for a variety of reasons. The culture of the organization may not be safe to share ideas or ask why we do the things we do. The Rudolph Factor refers to that critical 10 percent.
In the book, we have identified Sixteen Ways to Recognize a Rudolph. We also have the list posted on our website at www.therudolphfactor.com. In brief, Rudolphs connect the dots that others don’t see, and they tend to generate sustainable solutions more quickly and efficiently than their counterparts, and because their thinking tends to be counter-intuitive, Rudolphs are typically considered outcasts or loose cannons until their talents are needed (often at the 11th hour of a crisis, at which point they are often hailed as heroes).
3) Cyndi, why is it that there are so few leaders around? Do the schools not train for leadership skills?
I believe there are a lot of employees with good leadership skills; however, many companies actually hinder their employees’ ability to lead from where they are by having a challenging, sometimes toxic culture; an archaic reward structure based on rules, rather than values; and/or a corporate constitution that more closely resembles a dictatorship or bureaucracy than a democracy.
In my research, I have found that the language people use to define leadership either opens or hinders opportunities to lead. To remedy this problem, I have redefined leadership as “a commitment to the success of the people around you”.
This isn’t anything earth-shattering and follows many of the tenets of natural leadership, servant leadership, and some elements of situational leadership. However, the effect of employees taking this definition to heart has a profound impact on everything else within the organization.
With regard to schools’ training for leadership, most tend to focus more on the skills (the actions or behaviors) of leaders, rather than the underlying driving principles and thinking that make up an exceptional leader. It isn’t generally what the leader has done but how the leader values, respects, and thinks about people that drives his or her actions as a leader.
4) What are the pros and cons of being a “Rudolph”?
This is an excellent question because when people first learn about being a Rudolph, the natural inclination is to want to be one. Truth be told, it is not all glory in being a Rudolph. In fact, often times it feels like a curse because you just cannot turn off your thinking, yet it feels like it is not valued by your direct manager or employer.
The pros of being a Rudolph are that you connect the dots more quickly and naturally than people are you, meaning, you see how things fit together more readily (you’re a systems thinker). You also see the world through a lens of opportunity and potential, which opens many doors to problem solving and innovative thinking. Your nonconventional nature forces you to find very strategic ways to get your ideas implemented. What I find as the best part of being a Rudolph is that you really do not have a personal agenda. Your actions and decisions are intended for the betterment of the organization and the larger society, in general. These people want to change the world and have just enough smarts and guts to make it happen! And, the greatest reward a Rudolph can experience is seeing their ideas making a difference in the world, however big or small…leaving a hoof print!
The cons of being a Rudolph is that more often than not, you work for someone who doesn’t understand your thinking, or worse, your intention to make the organization better. You can come across as a loose cannon, a trouble-maker or general problem employee by asking “Why?” when it is not the most popular but is the most valuable question to be asking. Often times, a Rudolph’s direct manager is quite threatened by the unconventional approach Rudolphs take to get things done and do not realize how good a Rudolph can make their manager look. Managers want good ideas but not the risk that comes with innovation. The biggest drawback to being a Rudolph is, try as you may, you can’t be anything other than a Rudolph. You can put mud on your nose and try to hide your innovative thinking, but you just can’t turn it off.
5) Leadership, in my mind combines people skills and verbal skills and creative skills. What have I missed?
I think the most important part of being a leader is demonstrating your commitment to other peoples’ success. As David Bowman, a phenomenal leader who also happens to be the VP and General Manager of Tanker Programs for The Boeing Company best put it while we were working on “The Rudolph Factor” book, “My job is to connect people to their future, whatever and wherever that might be.” Nothing speaks more favorably to leadership than putting others above your own personal agenda. The reward comes back tenfold, if not more.
6) What have you found out about great leaders?
Great leaders, whether it be in history, business, or in the classroom put 100% of their attention and focus on other people. They are aware of and deeply value the unique contribution that people bring to the table. When you speak with a great leader, they are unabashedly humble and speak very highly about their people and how the organization could not be what it is without the contribution of great people.
It’s like pulling teeth from a tiger to get a great leader to talk about him/ herself. I have found asking a leader to talk about him/herself to be a great litmus test for identifying greatness.
7) Cyndi, everyone wants to hire the best and brightest, but all too often, it seems that they do not succeed. Why is it so hard to hire the best and the brightest?
I don’t think it is hard to hire the best and the brightest, particularly in these tough economic times. There is no shortage of great people out there who are capable of doing exceptional work. I think the problem arises when you’ve hired a great person but don’t have the internal capacity to let that person really blossom into their work. Granted, there will always be clock-punchers who check-in/check-out and use work as a means to another end – and they are a necessary part of the organizational equation. But I believe in people, and I believe they want to do good things when given the opportunity and access (I’ll limit that response to the work environment because I admit to being troubled about where our world is today and the things people are doing that make the evening news).
8) Now, why Boeing? What have they done that is so attractive in terms of business and industry?
I really like this question because Boeing is a huge company (somewhere around 160,000 employees, I believe), and one thing that we do not espouse in the book is that the entire Boeing enterprise is like Boeing’s C-17 Program that we focused on in “The Rudolph Factor”. As with most large organizations of their size, there will always be really great parts and other parts in need of great improvement. I believe the Boeing enterprise has a lot to learn from what has and continues to transpire at the C-17 manufacturing facility in Long Beach, California.
For quick reference, the C-17 is an exceptional cargo aircraft that holds ~170k pounds of payload, yet can land in the same size of a footprint as a little, 4-seater Sesna aircraft. It only requires three personnel to operate (pilot, navigator, and loadmaster) can also land on unpaved runways and perform three-point turns to turnaround, which makes it a front-runner in humanitarian efforts. It’s pretty amazing. I recently read an article about the first all-woman C-17 team and was quite impressed.
Back to the question, what the Boeing C-17 Program did that was so attractive to me is that they were able to revolutionize a culture that was in complete disarray, with animosity between employees, managers, the unions, the customers, and suppliers (over 10,000 employees at the time) – to being awarded our Nation’s most prestigious quality honor, The Malcolm Baldrige Quality Award in 1998. I first learned of their story in 2003 and wanted to share ever since. Their transformation included a variety of training and quality initiatives, like most companies can do, but what set it apart was the thinking and discoveries made along the way (most of which were by accident and trial-and-error).
After interviewing all different sectors of employees including front-line workers, union workers, managers, executives, and customers, I learned that their “silver bullet” was becoming people centric, rather than product- or process-focused. They recognized that if their people were being treated impeccable well and engaged with the tools and resources to do the right thing, the product and the processes would naturally correct themselves (along with much training and initiatives). It was the way in which things were introduced that I found remarkable, among other things. Senior leadership would have an idea and send it directly to the people doing the work. Then, workers and senior leaders would almost “put the squeeze” on all the layers of middle management to get everyone on the same page and share the value in proposed changes.
“The Rudolph Factor” captures this thinking and offers a systemic approach as well as a new psychology of change model we refer to as AVTAR so that other organizations can emulate similar results…not from copying actions, but from addressing it at the thinking level.
9) A few years back you wrote a book called “Catch!” about a group of World Famous Fishmongers in Seattle. What did all those guys have in common with the folks at Boeing?
They both came out of the beautiful State of Washington. Kidding aside, the most common feature between the fishmongers at Pike Place Fish and the folks at Boeing is that they have created an environment where everyone can contribute to their fullest – from workers, to managers, senior leadership, and of course, Rudolphs! Both cultures foster (and reward) creativity, innovative thinking, and great ideas – as well as the inherent risk that comes hand-in-hand with innovation. Both have extraordinary products, both groups are super-charged about making a difference in the world, and both have visions that go far beyond the boundaries of their respective organizations.
10) Some of your “Rudolph” leaders are obviously motivated by money. What else motivates them?
Actually, that’s the interesting part, Rudolphs are not motivated by money. Imagine that? Seriously though, Rudolphs are completely motivated by being able to express their ideas – however unconventional the ideas might be – and being able to implement their ideas. Now, this doesn’t mean that every idea a Rudolph comes up should be implemented…I’m simply saying that a voice and access to implement viable ideas is what keeps a Rudolph’s nose glowing. And I can tell you that it doesn’t take long for a Rudolph to put mud on their nose and very purposefully stop sharing ideas if they have been out-casted, railroaded, side-lined, or any number of things that many poor Rudolphs have experienced. They really just want to do good for their company – and often times for the larger society. Rudolphs’ greatest reward is seeing their idea in action.
What have I neglected to ask?
The only thing I can think of is where people can get a copy of the book and where to find more information! “The Rudolph Factor” is available at Amazon, BarnesandNoble.com, and bookstores everywhere. It was intentionally designed to be a book that an entire organization reads, so large volume purchases can be made at the two aforementioned as well as 1800CEOREAD and BooksaMillion.com.
More information can be found at www.therudolphfactor.com, www.guidetogreatness.com, and people can email me directly at Cyndi@guidetogreatness.com. Thank you for the opportunity to share!
|